Mandate Law

Can my AI agent buy things for users?

The legal questions behind agents that book, buy, and pay for users, including authority, errors, payments, merchant terms, and disclosure.

Short answer

Yes. Federal and state electronic-transactions laws recognize contracts formed through electronic agents, provided the agent's actions can legally be attributed to the user. The card networks now run live programs for agent-initiated payments. The legal questions are about everything around the purchase: whether the user actually authorized it, who absorbs the loss when the agent gets it wrong, and whether the merchants' and payment networks' rules allow it.

The law on electronic agents

Authority: what did the user actually agree to?

Your user is the principal and your agent acts for them. Your terms and your product design together define the scope of that authority. There are two basic models:

Either way, record everything: what the agent did, which authorization it relied on, the exact text the user saw, and when. In a dispute, that log is your evidence.

Errors and disputes

When an agent buys the wrong thing, the user will dispute it with you, with the merchant, or with their card issuer. Plan for this:

Payments

The sites and services your agent uses

Disclosure and untrusted content

Checklist an agent can run against the codebase

If this applies to you

An agent product review covers the authority model, your terms, payments, the sites your agent operates, and a build spec for confirmation gates, logs, and limits. Adding one new kind of action to an existing agent is a pre-build feature check.